Platform

From upload to an evidenced audit report.

From PDF or DOCX upload to a structured ILPA 3.0 audit report, with mandatory source references and verifiable results.

Audit view

Traceable results for every criterion.

The audit view shows all 18 ILPA 3.0 criteria with result, rationale and direct source evidence.

  • Score and overviewWeighted overall score from 0 to 100 and the distribution of results at a glance.
  • Source evidenceExact quotation from the agreement for every result, traceable in the audit trail.
  • Filter viewFilter results by status and open flagged criteria directly.
  • PDF and DOCX uploadFile type, file size and content are checked before processing.
Audit view with score, result distribution and criteria list
Portfolio overview with all completed audits

Portfolio

All audits in a portfolio overview.

The portfolio brings together your team’s audits and shows status, score and flagged items at a glance.

  • Audit history

    All audits with date, status and score.

  • Flagged funds

    Spot funds with low scores immediately.

  • Export

    Report data for internal reporting.

  • Team access

    Access for authorised users in your team.

Contract chat

Follow-up questions on the contract text.

The integrated chat helps with follow-up questions on the LPA. Answers refer to the contract text and are intended as a working aid.

  • “How is the clawback provision in Section 8 worded?”
  • “Is there an exemption for co-investments?”
  • “Under what conditions can the GP offset fees?”
Contract chat

How is the clawback provision worded in the LPA?

The provision is in Section 8.3. A manual review is recommended for the ILPA criterion because the clawback mechanism is described but no clear deadline is specified.
Partly metSource: Section 8.3

Results

Five clearly defined result categories.

Every criterion receives one of five clearly defined results, with rationale and source evidence.

  • Met

    The criterion is clearly and fully addressed in the LPA.

  • Partly met

    The criterion is partially addressed – there are gaps or ambiguities.

  • Not met

    The criterion is missing from the LPA or contradicts the ILPA recommendations.

  • Unclear

    The wording is ambiguous – a manual review is recommended.

  • Not found

    The relevant information could not be located in the document.

Systematic LPA audits for your team

Speak to our team and see Adamant Assets in a focused demo.